Assassination Vacation

[Assassination Vacation by Sarah Vowell - 2005, Simon & Schuster]

This is an excellent book and would have earned 10 out of 10 if it weren't for a couple of real annoying things about it - as it is, I would have to give it an 8 on the AArtVark scale.

An exploration of the assassinations of three presidents:

- Abraham Lincoln by John Wilkes Booth
- James A. Garfield by Charles Guiteau
- William McKinley by Leon Czolgosz

Sarah Vowell manages to dig beneath the history most were taught in public schools and dig up a plethora of fun and entertaining facts and coincidences about the assassinations of three now forgotten presidents (except Lincoln, he's on the penny). Some of them are intriguing and some are laugh out loud funny - personally I enjoy gallows humour and have a soft spot for the pie full of irony that life tends to throw in our faces every now and then, so this was an extremely enjoyable read. If you want to read good reviews of this book, go searching on the web to find some - you won't have to scroll long - I will present you with my annoyances.

There are a couple of things however which stuck in my eyes like a couple of sore thumbs:
- A minor point of contention for me that ran through the whole book was the sense that presidential assassins, though interesting footnotes of history, are dismissed as lunatics with no sense or purpose to their actions. I did not get the sense that Sarah Vowell believes that there might be any logic, no matter how twisted or deranged, to the actions of the assassin - as if merely the act of assassination by de facto negates any logic or purpose which might have existed in the mind of the assassin. I am bothered by this because without an unbroken chain of thought and motivation, I believe, the assassin would not carry out his assassination as if a thought spontaneously was planted in his mind by the Devil himself.
- The major thumb which caught me by surprise and nearly gouged my eye out - my immediate visceral reaction being to throw the book across the room - has to do with a specific paragraph starting on page 130 and continuing to page 131. It is there, that practically out of nowhere, and if I were to prescribe to the Vowell Assassination Theory, I would think the paragraph planted by the Devil himself, Sarah Vowell chooses to rip into Ralph Nader like an elementary schoolgirl pinching a boy out of sheer spite.

[...] With a century and change between the 1880 convention and now, I'll admit I rolled my eyes at the ideological hairsplitting, wondering how a group of people who more or less agreed with one another about most issues could summon forth such stark animosity. Thankfully, we Americans have evolved, or hearts made larger, our minds more open, welcoming the negligible differences among out fellows with compassion and respect. As a Democrat who voted for Al Gore in the 2000 presidential election, an election suspiciously tipped to tragic Republican victory because of a handful of contested ballots in the state of Florida, I, for one, would never dream of complaining about votes siphoned in that state by my fellow liberal Ralph Nader, who convinced citizens whose hopes for the country differ little from my own to vote for him, even though had those votes gone to Gore, perhaps those citizens might have spent their free time in years to come more pleasurably pursuing leisure activities, such as researching the sacrifice of Family Garfield, instead of attending rallies and protests against wars they find objectionable, not to mention the money saved on aspirin alone considering they'll have to pop a couple every time they read the newspaper, wondering if the tap water with which they wash down the pills is safe enough to drink, considering the corporate polluter lobbyists now employed by the EPA.[...]

I blinked my eyes at this - the whole machinery of enjoyment just ground to a halt. Here in one paragraph, all the evils of the present administration have been brought about by Ralph Nader who somehow, like modern day political Svengali, managed to bamboozle citizens like myself and my wife to vote for him! (Coincidentally, we voted for him again in 2004.) If someone flings this kind of poison ink on a page, I would at least like to know the logic behind it. I suspect there is none and for true blue Democrats, bitterness is the only thing to be held onto, because hope, especially now, is in short supply - and having given away their principles piece by piece over the last twenty or thirty years there's nothing to fall back on.

So there it is - an excellent book almost entirely ruined by one paragraph. I would urge anyone with interest in cemeteries, assassinations, history, humour and a taste for quixotic non-fiction to give Assassination Vacation a read. It'll be worth your while.